This is an unedited version of an article published by The Times of Swaziland under the "As I See It" column on July 17, 2013.
By Vusi Sibisi
Prime Minister Sibusiso Barnabas Dlamini in
explaining his role in the investigations by the Anti Corruption Commission of
alleged mismanagement of funds of the local chapter of the Commonwealth Parliamentary
Association is attempting to clear his name of having politically manipulated
the investigations by painting himself as an honest broker caught in the
penultimate cross-fire.
The problem in believing this is that every
one of us has a history, which history defines our actions. And similarly, the
incumbent PM also has a history that defines how he has conducted himself in
public office. Regrettably his record is one that no one, perhaps with the
exception of himself, will be proud of. It portrays a scary picture of a man
fixated with himself and would stop at nothing, by hook or crook, to have his
way.
I should hasten that in no way am I trying
to defend those incriminated by the investigations and hopefully they will have
their day in court where they will prove their innocence or otherwise.
The PM’s stated position, and indeed
participation if not facilitation, in the investigations might have gone
exactly how he has explained it in his interview with the Times SUNDAY. But is the
PM’s explanation enough to exculpate him from culpability and to remove the
widely held perception of suspected political skullduggery on his part that is motivated
by a desire to end the political life of one Marwick Khumalo, the long-serving
Lobamba Lomdzala Member of Parliament. After all it is common knowledge that
there is no love lost between the two political protagonists.
As I see it, the timing of the arrests of
those suspected to have ransacked funds of the local branch of the Commonwealth
Parliamentary Association (CPA), coming as it did in the middle of a general
election, has naturally fueled the perception that the case was politically
motivated to unseat MP Khumalo from parliament. As for the others, they are
collateral victims caught in the cross-fire but still convenient for providing
a false façade of the case to the public. MP Khumalo has been charged along
with Senator Bhutana Dlamini, former Clerk to Parliament Sanele Nxumalo and
Nompumelelo Zulu, an accountant in parliament, over the alleged misappropriation
of E5.8 million from the local branch of the CPA.
Since the CPA case exploded into the public
domain it triggered flashing images of some of the unsavoury cases that have a
direct bearing on the incumbent PM, especially his discharge of the responsibilities
and duties of his office. Needless to mention, some of his actions and indeed
decisions did not augur well for the high office he occupied then and is
occupying now.
The case of the forceful removal of the
late Ben Zwane from the position of Clerk to Parliament at the instance of the
PM has somewhat provided the unlikely backdrop to the current CPA case. That
case was quite graphic in depicting the use or abuse of political power towards
the achievement of certain goals and objectives. And it did not depict the
incumbent PM as one who judicially exercised the political power at his
disposal other than for settling personal scores with individuals he perceived
to be his detractors and enemies. That, as the minister also responsible for
the police, he unleashed the law enforcing agency to physically remove the late
Zwane from the parliament precinct even though he was armed with and wielding a
court order in the faces of police officers apparently unleashed to execute a
political directive, showed that his ruthless streak knew no bounds. Not even
the courts could stop him.
The Zwane case is one of many that were
instructive in helping us to understand the man and his exercise of the
political power of the office of the PM. These included the media, with this
newspaper at one time being sanctioned with government advertisements while
others were shut down for apparently refusing to conform under this very PM’s
watch. Yet now, we are expected to understand and appreciate his actions in the
alleged CPA fraud investigations as not having been purely apolitical but
merely administrative towards enabling the Anti Corruption Commission (ACC) to
do its work.
Just recently the PM somewhat acknowledged
his typical disposition to using state power to deal with his detractors and
critics when he informed lawmakers that government was keeping a record of all
those who speak ill of and criticize government and the leadership. The
intention of this was to punish those involved by, among others, marginalizing
them from appointment to key public positions. God knows what other forms of
punishment await those who make his list. That is why today we even see some
pieces of legislation, such as the Elections Expenses Bill, that are manifestly
targeted at certain individuals and political organisations to malign them from
the elections.
As I see it, while the PM has explained how
he came to write the letter to CPA headquarters requesting assistance to be
extended to the ACC in order to complete its investigations, there is still
that matter of the reshuffle of the parliamentary administration that saw then
Clerk to Parliament Sanele Nxumalo being replaced by Ndvuna Dlamini. Could it
be that decision was also at the instance of the ACC to enable investigations
into the management of the funds of the local branch of the CPA? The answer to
that question is, of course, a big no because the truth of the matter is that
it was to allow the Auditor General to do an investigation. In other words this action was pre-emptive to
the subsequent investigation by the ACC that led to the arrest of the four
suspects.
As I see it, the matter could have been
investigated normally without creating wrong perceptions that it was targeted
at someone, specifically MP Khumalo. Had this been the case, a normal
investigation would have been carried out as soon as there was suspicion of
wrong doing or criminality instead of invoking political authority that
culminated with a reshuffle in the parliament administration.
And although some of us have long lost
confidence in the judiciary of this country, hopefully the accused will have
their day in court to prove their innocence.
No comments:
Post a Comment